It seems that on the occasion of the 150th anniversary of the junta Italy City of Casalborgone he has made another of his. Has seen fit to accept the proposal of a nostalgic all'intitolazione on a square to Umberto II of Savoy, better known as "King of May". The motivation, in sum, is that although everyone knew that the referendum of 2 June 1946 was "fake" (this, literally, the term appropriated by the Government, but each barrel of wine that has) to the Republic, the last king of Savoy Portuguese preferred exile to avoid a clash between royalists and republicans without quarter. In short, Umberto II deserves the dedication as "mild hero" of national reconciliation.
Everybody understands that taking this motivation, rather than declare it inadmissible, is to de-legitimize themselves: if the republic is born to be a hoax, all of its central and peripheral institutions suffer from this vice of origin, including establishing "common Casalborgone. The waterfall is destabilizing consequences of the irresponsibility of this act. But at least be consistent: if you truly believe that this is so, resign in order to combat these illegal institutions, rather than represent them. Lusinghino not the handful of nostalgic casalborgonesi to pick up their consent. I hope that the minority in the council and all sincere Republicans oppose in all institutions and forms permitted in this latest provocation.
course, Berlusconi-style, The mayor cast the stone and hide the hand. hastened to say that he does not agree with the reasoning that he is a fervent Republican. But meanwhile, continues to wink to the nostalgic, saying that the person is still worthy of recognition because they saved us from the civil war (which indeed was already, according to all historians longer accredited) .. In any case, who really was Umberto II? Her acceptance of exile is the last act of a political biography in the name of "fear of his own shadow." Anti-Nazi, and in many ways at odds with Mussolini, was never able to transform this "moral rebellion" into political action that can make clear that Italy had other ideas and the role of the monarchy. November 8, 1943 when the cover is the real shame of running away at night from Rome to take refuge in Brindisi, Umberto, realizing that this would probably be the end of the monarchy, think several times to return to Rome, but in the end it does not and through the crowd to board as a whole quell'impresentabile "ruling class". When his father Vittorio Emanuele III abdicated in favor of May 9, 1946, hoping thereby to separate cunningly his responsibilities from those of the dynasty, Umberto accepts. Not a sense of responsibility, but, shall we say, lack of personality. In front of the case challenged the referendum, simply does what he always said his character. It is right to do what he does, but does not by greatness of soul, but for obvious lack of political virtues. I ask you: is a good reason to name a square? Not for nothing that no one had ever thought of before. I suppose out of respect - a respect that is being lost today - to those who really have saved the dignity of the nation. Casalborgone If you want to just put a hand to place names, it would be better to acknowledge the merit of having pacified rebuilt and destroyed by fascist Italy and from a monarchy to an accomplice of those who wrote our Constitution. Among them was Giorgio La Pira, that this administration has been shown to know and to honor a recent conference dedicated to him. Perhaps it was one of the most important constituents, but why not spend it in the square?. By the way, that referendum, in Piedmont, gave a clear victory for the republic: 57.1 against 42.9 of the votes validly cast. With these percentages to cry now any political triumph, considering not only winning, but he had knocked out his opponent.
Ermanno Vitale.
IN PHOTOS: King Vittorio Emanuele II of Savoy, Prince Umbero II after fuga da Roma sulla nave "Baionetta" verso Brindisi.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
What is the point today named a square in King Umberto II of Savoy than to gain visibility with some step in the papers or maybe a pretext is the 150th anniversary of the unification of Italy to make the ; provocation? We explain what these gentlemen did this really useful for this Savoy p OUNTRY or for our nation. If we look back there is really a shame. Who was willing to fascism, to promote the rise in support for two decades until the tragedy of the Second World War, where Italy took part in the conflict in terms of total military unpreparedness, only to get those thousand deaths needed to "sit at the table of the winners? And what about the conspiracy, treason, desertion, and the shameful flight from Italy. They never, the Savoy, made the choice clear, dignified and decent?
Casalborgone I think you deserve better and without trying and without going too far, can find another name, perhaps less noble and less famous but certainly more worthy of being nominated to appear on plaque should call that stretch of road or square that is. I was a: Eligio battu. A man who had chosen the partisan struggle and that he had lived, first as a "rebel" and with dignity, without losing sight of the real values \u200b\u200bof life and of the Republican Constitution, was also born with a small contribution .
Vinicio Milani,
ANPI Chamber President Boris Bradac "Chivasso.
0 comments:
Post a Comment