Free yourself from the chains with which some politicians have firmly imprisoned there. Use your brain. Strive to learn a little of the Italian Constitution as it was originally and how it has changed.
Among changes over time there have been changes made to the Constitution Act of 18 October 2001, 3: "Amendments to Title V of Part II of the Constitution."
The amendments to Title V of the Constitution are absolutely legitimate because in harmony with that laid down the original text of 1948, but not limited to, taking account of national over the years was necessary, in my opinion, make these changes to prevent the Central Government or the Parliament strengthen Casta, already powerful, so that, without knowledge of the facts, continued to dictate rules on matters that could not have known by then best interests of lobbies and concentrate absolute power over its members.
None amministraztori better citizens and elected at the municipal level (for example) can get close and face the problems and propose solutions best suited to the place where you live (eg. A municipality).
- you may know and find solutions for what happens in your neighbor's house more than at home?
- you feel you are entitled to identify problems and solutions related to your neighbor instead of your first thought?
_________
Reasoning on constitutional law cited above: http://www.parlamento.it/parlam/leggi/01003lc.htm
If you'll notice the article 3 of the above-mentioned law expands and further clarifies what was stated in the original article. 117 regarding the ownership legislative matters that should be the responsibility of central government and those of local expertise. The principles are the same but more detailed in the text editing.
Se noterete l'articolo 4 modifica l'art. 118 dando più diritti ai cittadini e pone le basi per una Democrazia Diretta a partire appunto dagli enti comunali, molto più appropriata e facile da instaurare. I cittadini abituati a delegare (con i risultati ottenuti che conosciamo tutti - ovvero che si è creata e fortificata nel tempo una Casta a cui poco interessa il bene della nazione) non sarebbero in grado di esercitare DIRETTAMENTE la sovranità che gli appartiene se non per piccoli passi.
L'art. 118 come modificato dalla legge in questione infatti recita all'ultimo comma:
Stato, Regioni, Città metropolitane, Provinces and municipalities promote the autonomous initiatives of citizens, individually and in combination, to carry out activities of general interest , based on the principle of subsidiarity '. "
Note that the principle of subsidiarity' has remained the danger that many (not clear what purpose) are afraid of regarding the unification of Italy and is tendentious and false alarms (used to maintain as an unchanged status quo that has produced only damage and favored few).
Article. Article 7 further amended. 123 of the Constitution that did not originally included local referendums, referendum already introduced by art. 3 della precedente Legge Costituzionale del 22 novembre 1999, n.1.
Ogni altra modifica apportata al testo originale riporta in maniera esplicita che tutto deve essere fatto nel rispetto della Costituzione e, quindi, tutto ciò che non dovesse rispecchiare i principi fondamentali di cui ai primi 12 articoli della Costituzione è impugnabile davanti alla Corte Costituzionale (art. 134 Cost.).
Queste critiche alle modifiche costituzionali apportate finora ad opera di alcuni personaggi famosi e di rilievo nel mondo politico/istituzionale italiano si scontrano con la Costituzione originale del 1948 perché l'Autonomia degli enti locali era un obiettivo che nel corso del tempo si doveva reach as expected since then.
The power was gradually passing from the state to local authorities on certain issues and the strengthening of Direct Democracy Initiative (cittadeini of voters) is in perfect harmony with the broader concept of "democracy" as expressed in art. 1 of the Constitution where it says that "sovereignty belongs to the people .
Article. IX of the transitional and final of the Italian Constitution reads:
The Republic, within three years after the entry into force of this Constitution, shall adjust its laws to the needs of local government and legislative power devolved to the regions .
Lart. 5 of the Constitution (NB in \u200b\u200bthe top 12 articles that cover the basics) states:
The Republic, one and indivisible, recognizes and promotes local autonomies and implements services that depend on the State the largest administrative decentralization, adapting the principles and methods of its legislation to the needs autonomy and decentralization.
more clearly than that you die!
We
venircene out by the overwhelming power of which the cast has abused for 63 years? We begin to free ourselves of the chains that men of power, although they are nice and honest, we were leaning because of the appearances to keep in mind that we ARE ALWAYS PEOPLE WHO ARE PART OF THE SYSTEM AND THE SYSTEM benefit.
Without these constitutional changes would not take place even art. 8 of Decree No. 267/00 which requires local authorities to apply the principles of popular initiative at the municipal, provincial and regional ... principles, however, must still be applied even though 10 years have elapsed since the entry into force of this law (but here I think most citizens depends e non tanto dagli amministratori che, forse, stanno cercando di capire fino a che punto i cittadini vogliono esercitare in maniera DIRETTA la loro sovranità)
P.S.
Un'altra modifica alla Costituzione INDUBBIAMENTE NECESSARIA ed a vantaggio dei cittadini schiacciati dalla magistratura è stata quella apportata con Legge costituzionale 23 novembre 1999, n° 2. che ha modificato l'art. 111 e riguardante il GIUSTO processo.
Prima era così:
Tutti i provvedimenti giurisdizionali devono essere motivati. Contro le sentenze e contro i provvedimenti sulla libertà personale, pronunciati dagli organi ordinary or special courts, it is always possible to appeal to the Supreme Court for violation of the law. You can waive this rule only to the judgments of military courts in wartime. Against the decision of the State Council and the Court of Auditors on appeal to the Supreme Court is permitted only for reasons of jurisdiction.
Now (after the change) is as follows:
Jurisdiction is implemented through due process regulated by law.
Each process takes place in between the parties, on an equal footing, before an independent and impartial court. The law provides for the reasonable duration.
In a criminal trial, the law provides that the person accused of a crime is, in the shortest possible time, confidentially informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him, has the time and conditions needed to prepare his defense, have the authority, the courts, to examine or have examined, the people who make statements against him, to obtain the attendance and examination of persons on their behalf under the same conditions as the prosecution and the acquisition of any other evidence in its favor, to be assisted an interpreter if he can not understand or speak the language used in the process.
The criminal trial is governed by the rule that the parties in the formation of the test. The guilt of the accused not can be established on the basis of statements made by those who, by choice, it is always voluntarily avoided by the accused or his counsel.
The law regulates the cases in which the formation of contradictory evidence does not occur in the consent of the defendant or proven impossibility of an objective nature or effect of proven misconduct.
All judicial decisions must be justified.
against sentences and against measures on personal freedom (cf. . Art. 13) pronounced by ordinary courts or special, it is always possible to appeal to the Supreme Court for violation of the law. You can exceptions to this rule only to the judgments of military courts in wartime.
against decisions of the State Council and the Court of Auditors on appeal to the Supreme Court is permitted only for reasons of jurisdiction.
come forward SOMEONE WHO HAS THE COURAGE TO CHALLENGE ANYTHING ...
PPS
Despite this amendment to the many contradictory between the parties Judges slam it highly but his balls are always there to take high salaries and do whatever they want against the contraddottorio who wants to produce ... I speak of citizens with politics and especially political parties have never had anything to do (I am one of them)
Bruno February 20, 2011 April - tel. 3472954867 - Locate Varesino (CO) - City Committee CCDD DD
https: / / picasaweb.google.com / brunoaprile.aprile / ModificheCostituzionali # 5575721130537682386
http://brunoaprile.ucoz.com/publ/modifiche_costituzionali_ingiustamente_criticate/1- 1-0-32
Bruno February 20, 2011 April - tel. 3472954867 - Locate Varesino (CO) - City Committee CCDD DD
Direct Democracy - CCDD - email: comitatoccdd@gmail.com 
0 comments:
Post a Comment